﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--RSS generated by Feeder-Breeder at Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:49:53 GMT-->
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on 'Sepang Thoughts - BMW Sauber' on F1 Insight</title>
    <link>http://f1insight.madtv.me.uk/ </link>
    <description>Keep up to date with this post on F1 Insight</description>
    <copyright>Clive Allen</copyright>
    <generator>RSS Feeder-breeder by Mad</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Björn Svensson</title>
      <description>Well Clive, there's at least two questionmarks in the way of BMW, namely Ferrari and McLaren.
I think they both will make considerable changes to their cars ahead of Bahrain. Ferrari because there's been quite a few engines failing in the two first races, mostly customer engines but even that should make them take a look at their own engines to. McLaren had a really different race in Malaysia compared to Australia, so i think that they will have to revise quite alot of settings and configurations before they go to Bahrain. They on the other hand don't seem to have any problems at all with the reliability of the cars. 

And then there's Toyota, who really have become the surprise in the start of the season. At least in Malaysia. So in some ways i think that they could improve even more before Bahrain, and this could really be their best season since they entered F1. And that would be a welcome surprise to me, even though i left the comments i did a few posts ago. There must have been some smiles on the lips of Trulli in the last few days.

And, of course BMW must have some surprises in their stack of upgrades coming in the last few weeks. In the way they have been talking them selves up during winter testing and considering how well they did in Australia with Rosberg on the podium, i think they are a force to consider this season.

Oh! And really of topic. About this page and the verificationcode we have to enter before being able to post our comments. Would you please ask Mad if he just could ad an update button next to the box providing the numbers, so that we could update them before posting because they never really last as long as it takes to write a comment.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 12:55:57</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Björn Svensson</title>
      <description>Sorry for the error there. Of course i meant Williams in the last little column about the teams.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 12:58:57</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Clive</title>
      <description>I intend to have a look at all the main contenders this week, Björn, assessing their performance so far and guessing what the future holds for them.  No doubt Ferrari and McLaren will be doing whatever they can to solve any problems that have risen so far before Bahrain but so will BMW.  It is most likely that we won't notice any change in the relative competitiveness of these three teams until the European races.

I will ask Mad about the possibility of adding an update button but, in the meantime, you could try putting in the code as your last action before posting a comment.  Come to think of it, maybe that's the answer - for Mad to move the code down to the bottom of the comment, rather than the top...</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 13:11:38</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Alianora La Canta</title>
      <description>I think BMW will continue to alternate the fuel loads all season unless one driver obviously fares better on one version of the fuel load. The new rules mean that one car cannot have the same fuel load as the other, so only one can run at ideal speed in qualifying and only the other can take the optimum strategy into the race. BMW appear to be making this into a virtue by alternating a "qualifying car" with a "race car". In the interests of fairness, they're not going to lumber one driver with only playing one role.

Long may it (and the rest of their approach) continue to work for BMW.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 15:26:17</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Craig</title>
      <description>Good points Clive.

I would add though that Heidlfeld was up as high as third place by the first corner until Trulli ran wide and squeezed him out which is why he then dropped down to about tenth - this was a real chunk of bad luck, and coupled with the McLarens in qualifying  it explains why he was so far behind.

I'd still bet that Nick is the better race driver at this moment in time, but Kubica certainly isn't far behind.

If BMW continue to develop this car and can still devote time and effort to next year's car as well then 2009 will really see the sparks fly.  They must keep Heidfeld and Kubica though, they must surely be about the strongest driver pairing on the grid.

Oh, and I'd second the suggestions about the codebox timing out too quickly!!</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 16:05:00</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Clive</title>
      <description>It will become really interesting if BMW really do alternate the hare/tortoise strategy this year, Alianora.  Last season it was invariably Kubica that was the hare and a lot of people assumed he was quicker than Heidfeld as a result, always qualifying ahead.  But we might get a much better idea of their relative abilities now.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 16:23:26</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Clive</title>
      <description>Thanks for reminding me about Trulli pushing Heidfeld at the first corner, Craig - I was going to mention it in the post but it was forgotten amongst everything else I wanted to say.  It was very bad luck for for Heidfeld and, had it happened between say, Hamilton and Alonso, there would have been storms of outrage.  In Trulli's defence, I should point out that there was another car inside his, also forcing him to the outside of the corner.

And I can see you are one of the doubters who don't think BMW can do it this year.  2009 indeed - that's easy to say.  I think they might surprise you yet!  ;)</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 16:29:17</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Mad</title>
      <description>"&lt;em&gt;that's easy to say. I think they might surprise you yet!&lt;/em&gt;." That's what I've been telling Pooty.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 16:33:17</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Clive</title>
      <description>So what are we going to do about the CAPTCHA problem, Mad?</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 17:11:09</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Mad</title>
      <description>I'll see if I can lengthen the session timeout on the server.</description>
      <pubDate>24/03/2008 17:18:24</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Matty</title>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.instantcarinsurquote.com/"&gt;auto owners insurance&lt;/a&gt; :-D &lt;a href="http://www.cogenesys.com/online_colleges.html"&gt;online degrees&lt;/a&gt; mztnd &lt;a href="http://www.painpillsmarket.com/"&gt;tramadol hcl&lt;/a&gt; vaejk </description>
      <pubDate>15/07/2012 09:49:07</pubDate>
      <link>http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=252</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>